66 years old Chinese male underwent surgery to remove 2/3 of stomach due to antral ulcer in 2002. Pathological report revealed "Gastric glands has severe atypical dysplasia. Mitotic activity is obvious."
Patient then underwent 6 chemo treatments with 5FU and Mitomycin in 2002. Recovery seemed good with normal food intake and consumption. Blood work also appeared to be normal with no cancer marker above normal range.
Two years after the surgery ( 2004), routine blood test showed a rise in CA72-4.From Nov 2004 to Jan 2005, CA72-4 went from 10 to 160 ( compared to 0-6.9 normal range). CA19-9, CEA and CA24-2 remained normal. Several ultrasound and PET/CT tests revealed no lesion or other abnormality.
Patient were then underwent human interleukin treatment. CA72-4 went down to 20 immediately after the treatments. But as soon as the human interleukin treatment was stopped, CA72-4 went back to 130. Patient has no discomfort as CA72-4 went back to 130.
In May 2005, patient started taking Chinese herbal medicine with obvious effect. Within a month, CA72-4 went down from 130 to 7. CA72-4 remained in 5-15 range till this day as long as the patient kept taking the same medicine at prescribed level ( 5 times a day for a cocktail of three kinds of herbal medicine). Patient tried to reduce amount of the medicine ( partly due to its high cost). As soon as he reduced the medication intake and within a couple of weeks, CA72-4 went up to as high as 80.
While taking the herbal medicine, patient took frequent blood, ultrasonic, gastro scope and CT tests with no abnormality found other than slight hyperaemia on mucous membrane at the bottom of stomach in annual gastro scope checks ( always there). The patient appears to be in good health and lead an active life.
The questions here are:
1) Do we have cases in which CA72-4 was elevated to high level with no other cancer marker elevationï¼Ÿ 2) Does high level of CA72-4 ALONE lead to cancerous growth? 3) Is it okay for the patient to stop taking medication and ignore the elevated CA72-4? 4) What is the current status of research on CA72-4? Specifically, what is the source of CA72-4?
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.