See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests
Announcements
New US Diet Guidelines: What Not to Eat
Instead of just giving Americans a list of healthy food choices, the federal government takes a stab at showing us what not to eat. Get the facts here.
LDL = 65 (down from 135)
HDL+42View Thread
HDL = 108
LDL = 111
Triglycerides = 109
Total is high, but my HDL is very high (which is good, right?) and Triglycerides in the normal range. LDL is elevated, but not too much.
Why is my total considered 'high' if each individual component is good, or near-normal?
Could this indicate a genetic predisposition to high cholesterol? (My parents both have or had high cholesterol, but I assumed theirs was mostly due to insufficient exercise.) I run 3 miles 2-3 times per week (~30 minutes each session) and do yoga once a week for an hour and half. I also do a lot of walking. However, my job involves mostly sitting all day.
I'm seeing my Dr. on Thursday to discuss my results. Should I request additional testing?View Thread
Dr. Steven Nissen is quoted as saying;
"We've spent a lot of time, a lot of energy and we don't have anything to show for it. I don't think we're any closer to having evidence of a benefit than we were before this was done. There is a real risk of harm."
Too bad, it would have been nice to have an alternative treatment.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/26/docs-say-chelation-therapy-still-not-proven-to-work/2021163/View Thread
RinaView Thread
Total cholesterol 216
Triglycerides 49
VLDL 10
LDL 105
HDL 101
I have, to my knowledge, never had a coronary event. Is 101 HDL excessively high? It has gone from 80 to 101 over the past 1.5 years.
I have read the results of the PREVEND study and the study by Cossetti, Sparks, Ross et al, both of which identified an increased risk of coronary events in a healthy population with no history of coronary events, but with high HDL and CRP levels. My doctor does not perform CRP tests in the absence of coronary risk factors, but I'm wondering if I should have the CRP test. Or am I just paranoid?View Thread
LDL150
HDL 64
Trig 160
Total cholesterol 246
Ratio 3.8
Do you think I need to take statins ? Just diet and excercie. The numbers confuse me at some seem high but the ratio of 3.8 seems acceptable Any help is appreciated. Doctor wants me to take statins but prefer not to if possible. Looking for other opinions ThanksView Thread
LDL150
HDL 64
Trig 160
Total cholesterol 246
Ratio 3.8
Do you think I need to take statins ? Just diet and excercie. The numbers confuse me at some seem high but the ratio of 3.8 seems acceptable Any help is appreciated. Doctor wants me to take statins but prefer not to if possible. Looking for other opinions ThanksView Thread
2) What happens if his or her cholesterol rate continues to rise?
3) Can high cholesterol be avoided?
View Thread
Lower cholesterol is linked to an overall 22% reduction in cardiac events in individuals WITH heart disease, that is huge.
5 years after the end of the 4S study for Simvastatin, the statin groups have a 35% reduction in LDL and 30% reduction in mortality due to heart disease to date, that too s huge.
The Treating To new Targets (TNT) is proving that lower cholesterol is medically superior.
Take a look and give it a read, it's really a great article.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2013/03/01/do-we-really-need-head-to-head-comparison-trials-with-statins-to-improve-cardiac-health/?partner=yahootixView Thread
One time I was so bad I was behind the wheel driving and realized I maybe should not have my head was spinning .
I didn't take the pill yesterday and felt so much better so I bought the co q10 and garlic pills and I am getting off of the Linsinopril and Simvastaten right away .......this doctor I feel is trying to kill me , not to mention I read that all statins cause cancer.
Nice to know they can perscribe such garbage to us knowing this just to make a profit . I never trusted the medical profession and now I think I trust them even less now .
I don't even think I need the Lisinopril for blood pressure , mine elevates when in the doctors office for its like putting a rabbit in front of a cobra , mine elevates when in front of a physician ........
I am done with it , I am in control of my own body and I say what goes into it and if they give me a hard time its too bad for them my vascular surgeon will lecture me and plan on telling him to save his breath if falls on dead ears ............my mom was all holistic and I agree with her .View Thread
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=trial-sans-error-how-pharma-funded-research-cherry-picks-positive-resultsView Thread
I am 73 years old but have worked out with free weights 5 days a week for 25 years and fast-paced daily bike rides of 20-30+ miles for 15 years.
I began noticing loading 40 pound bags of topsoil in my truck would produce chest aches and nausea 2 days later. Cutting heavier branches with anvil trimmers or other chores involving chest muscle strains made me feel bad. This has gotten progressively worse. The past few months, almost 5 years after stopping Lipitor, I have developed tender palms and soles of feet, especially in early AM and now have quivering in calf muscles especially at night and early AM, as well as twitching of calf muscles off and on.
Jan. 1 I started taking branched chain amino acids (BCAA) and l-creatine and switched to ubiquitol form of CoQ10 but have seen no results as yet.
Lipitor appears to be very dangerous.View Thread
I was pulling some data as part of a research project I'm working on and found the article below. It is very interesting on several levels. The article was done by a British research group called The Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation (MRC/BHF) Heart Protection Study (HPS) and before it comes up, here is their statement of funding relationship:
Role of the funding source[br> [br> The trial was designed, conducted, analyzed, and interpreted by the investigators, independently of all funding sources. The writing committee had full access to the study data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
The purpose of this study was to reach out to over 20,000 participants in previous trials concerning the use of Simvastatin. They gathered data on their health and cholesterol levels for the past 11 years.
The basis of the findings is interesting. They again prove that for each 1 mmol decrease in LDL cholesterol there is up to a 27% reduction in a major cardiac event or death, which is a pretty major event itself.
Similar patterns were seen for each component of major vascular events (figure 1). For major coronary events, a 27% (SE 4) reduction was noted during the in-trial period (p<0·0001). During the post-trial period, the incidence rates were similar in both treatment groups (RR 0·96 [95% CI 0·88-1·04>; p=0·31), although a further reduction was recorded in first non-fatal myocardial infarction (413 [4·8%> vs 465 [5·7%>; p=0·01). For strokes, a 24% (SE 5) reduction was seen during the in-trial period (p<0·0001), reflecting a 29% (SE 6) reduction in definite ischemic stroke and no difference in hemorrhagic stroke (51 [0·5%> vs 56 [0·5%>; p=0·59). During the post-trial period, the incidence rates were similar in both treatment groups (0·98 [0·86-1·12>; p=0·77), with no adverse effect on hemorrhagic stroke (38 [0·4%> vs 51 [0·6%>; p=0·13). For revascularization procedures, a significant 24% (SE 4) reduction was seen during the in-trial period (p<0·0001). During the post-trial period, the incidence rates were similar in both treatment groups (0·93 [0·84-1·04>; p=0·20).
Also, they found that the effect of using Simvastatin continues for 5 years after use as well. The long term results of the use of Simvastatin remained unchanged during the 6 year follow up period which is reassuring as no increase in adverse effects were noted. The bottom line of their findings is stated below;
Prolonged follow-up in the Heart Protection Study now shows that reduction of about a quarter in vascular mortality and morbidity-produced by an average 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol with 5 years of statin therapy-persisted largely unchanged during the subsequent 6 years, despite similar LDL cholesterol
Concentrations and statin use in both treatment groups. Reassuringly, no adverse effects on particular causes of non-vascular mortality or major morbidity (including site-specific cancers) were seen to emerge during prolonged follow-up. These findings support prompt initiation and long-term continuation of statin treatment in people at increased risk of vascular events.
This is a very interesting article. I know some is a bit detailed but we can discuss any unclear issues.
http://www.natap.org/2011/newsUpdates/121511_04.htm
View Thread
not sure where to go with this. i've had pains in right side that radiate to back. recently was in er where they did all sorts of test and said its cholesterol stones in gallbladder. does that mean my cholesterol is high? all he said was here are some pain meds along with reglan and antibotics.
just concerned.View Thread
HDL/LDL OF 1.02
TOTAL/HDL 2.1
Is anyone in a similar situation and what has your doctor recommended?
Im 34, workout regularly. Ive had these levels since my 20s. And posibly my whole life considering my 20s is when I had my first cholesterol test.View Thread
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Featuring Experts
There are no Expert stories for this community right nowPopular Discussions
Helpful Tips
Helpful Resources
Related News
Related Drug Reviews
- Drug Name User Reviews
Report Problems to the
Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Other Cholesterol Management Information
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.
