See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests

For each sweet potato consumed in America, I'll bet there are another 10 white potatoes consumed. By making sweet potatoes "fair game" and white potatoes "food to avoid", it can create an arbitrary distinction that works well within the context of a "moderate carb" or "carb resistricted" eating plan. Most moderate carb eating plans draw arbitrary lines intended to allow some but not all "borderline foods" that are high in both fiber and starch.View Thread

From your previous post:
Dr D could you revisit this - pointed comments made to you. Thank you.
DoloresTeresa has not said anything about the bars just the shakes. So are they good for us or not? If there was "arsenic" in the shakes won't one get sick or even die? I thought Arsenic was poison!
Deb, you asked a good question about the nutritional aspects of the Biggest Loser shakes, and I gave a long answer (previously) indicating my mixed feelings about the potential benefits and drawbacks of shakes and bars as meal replacements. I voiced a centrist opinion on the topic, and I stood by the Biggest Loser shakes and bars as the best I could do to make something I could stand behind, given the limitations of the current state of food processing technology. If you're asking if the shakes are healthy my response is yes, if they are used to replace less healthy foods such as processed starches or sweets. Obviously whole natural foods are best.
The shakes do not contain arsenic (obviously).
Have you tasted the bars yet?View Thread

"It is very easy for health care providers and patients to rely on medications to get the numbers in line, without paying due attention to lifestyle change . The drugs can easily mask the problems that could be and should be addressed by lifestyle change. It is important to recognize that this is a very different situation than when a patient is making concerted lifestyle efforts, and seeing good results, but the health goals are still not being met.
Lastly, I would just like to acknowledge that we often use drugs and other treatments that have little or no benefit as reported in USA Today. Pharmaceutical companies sometimes exaggerate the benefits and downplay the risks of their products, and may do so via the design and interpretation of clinical trials that doctors, patients and the FDA rely on to assess the risks and benefits of drugs. For example, the makers of the diabetes drug Avandia have come under fire recently for unethical practices that were intended to downplay possible safety risks.View Thread

My favorites:
Turkey slices, chicken breast, carrots, pickles, cherry tomatoes, cucumber slices, bell pepper slices, celery with peanutbutter, apples, clementines, light yogurt, hard-boiled eggs, tuna with light mayo, calorie-free beverages. Some people might also chose trail mix (nuts and dried fruit), bananas, turkey jerky, diet jello cups, sugar-free candies/gum.
You have recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. I hope you will have many more questions we can help you with.
Michael Dansinger, MDView Thread

Thank you for sharing your important thoughts about the Biggest Loser bars. I indeed had a lot to do with the formulation of these bars.
Everybody agrees that whole foods are best for health. Fruits, vegetables, healthy proteins, etc. Having said that, it is not the people who strictly eat mainly whole foods that are generally struggling to overcome obesity. The rest of us are fighting a very challenging daily battle to find an eating strategy that is strict enough to prevent health problems, but free enough and enjoyable enough to actually follow consistently. In principle we should all just snack on whole foods, but in the real world I'm often trying to find ways to help people with obesity and type 2 diabetes to eat less junk food, restaurant food, candy, etc. Helping people find practical ways to navigate this challenge is part of what I must do in order to fight diabetes and obesity.
Why do people even want protein bars and shakes? Why not just eat an apple or raisins or a piece of fish? I wish I could actually get people to do that, but some people want ready-to-eat snacks or "meal replacements" that will satisfy hunger and taste like chocolate etc. Should we ignore this consumer demand and say protein bars have no potential role, or should we take a middle ground and try to make something that is actually going to help people adhere to a moderate-calorie eating strategy? Furthermore, medical research studies consistently and convincingly demonstrate that such shakes and bars help people achieve and sustain weight loss. Therefore I believe it is important to have "mixed feelings" about this category of processed foods. They represent a middle ground between whole foods versus candy bars etc.
When Biggest Loser and Walgreens invited me to join their collaborative efforts to provide folks who want protein bars and shakes with better options, I saw it as a meaningful way to help improve on what is already being purchased by many consumers. We worked hard to make products that are "all natural", without artificial ingredients, with the minimal amount of processed ingredients that will allow the product to be simultaneously tasty, healthy, affordable, and economically viable.
The bars are mainly made of dried fruit and nuts. They have soy protein, natural sweeteners (stevia) and natural flavoring such as cocoa. These bars are about as "clean" as you can get and still have a viable product. I'm pretty happy with the way they came out.
The shakes are made of milk protein, canola oil, natural flavorings like chocolate or vanilla, and some natural gums and fibers to provide body. They are sweetened with natural rather than artificial sweeteners, with no more than the minimum amout of sugar necessary to make an acceptably tasting product. The shakes are about as "clean" as you can get and still have a viable product. It was challenging to get it as good as we got it. Keeping the sugar low and the taste good was a major challenge that I pushed and pushed until we got it right.
I learned a lot in the process about why it is so hard to make processed food healthy. We should all stick mainly to whole foods, but for occasions when that is not realistic, we've got these "middle ground" products that are not ideal, but not so bad either. I stand by what I said: "the shakes and bars are for people who want to harness the power of natural foods and ingredients to maintain a healthy body weight, stay strong and live life to the fullest...people will find them to be a satisfying and practical way to help them meet their health goals."
Michael Dansinger, MD
There is no clear formula for the optimal bar or shake. It would be easier if shelf stabilityView Thread

My best guess is that your A1c level in the normal range is an accurate reflection of normal or near-normal glucose control. You have made considerable effort to control your blood sugar, and your A1c has improved previously in response to your efforts. If I recall correctly you have had A1c's over 6.0% in the past.
Having said that, It is harder to say whether the more recent change from 5.8% to 5.4% is a meaningful indicator of health improvement, or due to fluctuation in red cell lifespan or simply due to some degree of variability in the A1c testing. In such cases, we sometimes check the "fructosamine" level, which is an indicator of average glucose levels over the past 3 or 4 weeks because it measures the glycosylation of albumin and other proteins in the serum. This test is not affected by anemia. In the end, I think these issues are more theoretical than actual in your case. I encourage you to see what your medical team thinks.View Thread

I'm impressed by your explanation. The rate of red cell turnover is a key consideration in interpreting the A1c in light of anemia.
MichaelView Thread

Thank you for thinking of me and asking about me. I am well. I have been much lower profile on the diabetes community board lately simply because I've been distracted with other commitments. However I am back on track and I look forward to increasing my involvement again.
I'll check out the posts you note above.
Please update me on yourself when you have a chance.
Kindly,
MichaelView Thread

Thank you for your questions about how to treat your diabetes. As you indicated, your A1c in the 8 to 10 range puts you at high risk for complications such as damage to the retina, kidneys, nerves, and arteries. Blindness, kidney dialysis, limb loss and lethal heart attacks often occur in patients who allow their a1c's to remain at those levels for prolonged periods of time. You have been taking metformin and diamicron, but in most cases, doctors would also recommend additional medications such as insulin shots to bring the A1c to 7% if lifestyle changes cannot get you there.
In patients with type 2 diabetes who are not particularly overweight, we usually find low insulin levels. This indicates that the beta cells of the pancreas are making very little insulin and therefore the treatment of choice is typically insulin shots (or pump). I am not in a position to offer specific medical advice, but your doctor's recommendation of insulin shots certainly fits with what I would expect.
I am a strong proponent of lifestyle change (ambitious eating and exercise strategy) to push the A1c as low as possible
Here is a link to my blog post about the role of medications in type 2 diabetes:
http://blogs.webmd.com/life-with-diabetes-2/2010/04/are-diabetics-overmedicated.html
The supplements you mention are not really proven to make a difference. That does not mean they have no role, but we have convincing scientific evidence that pushing your A1c to 7% with prescription drugs including insulin can reduce the risk of complications and possibly increase survival, compared to leaving your A1c where it is.
Ultimately, it is always best to discuss these issues with your doctor, and if you feel like communication with your current doctor is not so good, then I encourage you to either address that issue or find a doctor with whom you feel comfortable. In my view there is too much at stake to leave your A1c in the high range any longer.
Thanks again for your important questions.
Michael Dansinger, MDView Thread

See Related Eating & Diet Communities
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Other Diabetes Information
- Diabetes Health Center
- Dieting Club: 50 – 100 Lbs Member Community Get Support from Members Like You!
- Blog : Conquering Diabetes with Michael Dansinger, MD
-
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.



