Diet Debate
We debate the various types of diets.
See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests
What's Happening Now
I think Seth was mistaken in his preference towards vegetarianism but was wise enough (and caring) not to push it too hard.
Incidentally, Rheumatoid Arthritis - a disease that Jane Roberts, one of the book author eventually died of, is according to Dr. Kwasniewski a typical low fat plant based diet disease! Kwasniewski's first successfull large scale application of his Optimal Diet was treating and curing of many of his RA patients in Ciechocinek Spa ("sanatorium") in the 1970-ties and 80-ties.
Regards,
H.View Thread
You may find that interesting (see FIG.1). This is a very thought provoking though speculative article:
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.ca/2012/05/on-glut5.html
Regards,
H.View Thread
http://pi-bill-articles.blogspot.com/2011/03/track-your-plaque-program-by-william.html
If you read it you will see that typically, one's plaque increases by 30 to 35% per year and this program is considered successful if the increase is only 5 to 10% per year!! This is success? I thought the program promised reversal. And it takes several years because he recommends the calcium scan involving the equivalent of several months worth of radiation in one shot be done every twelve months. Plus a diet that requires lots of protein and fats.
So when he documents success he is talking about less progress. And popping lots of supplements. I am not impressed.
DoloresView Thread
AbstractA healthy lifestyle may ameliorate metabolic syndrome (MetS); however, it remains unclear if incorporating nuts or seeds into lifestyle counseling (LC) has additional benefit. A 3-arm, randomized, controlled trial was conducted among 283 participants screened for MetS using the updated National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for Asian Americans. Participants were assigned to a LC on the AHA guidelines, LC flaxseed (30 g/d) (LCF), or LC walnuts (30 g/d) (LCW) group. After the 12-wk intervention, the prevalence of MetS decreased significantly in all groups: -16.9% (LC), -20.2% (LCF), and -16.0% (LCW). The reversion rate of MetS, i.e. those no longer meeting the MetS criteria at 12 wk, was not significantly different among groups (LC group, 21.1%; LCF group, 26.6%; and LCW group, 25.5%). However, the reversion rate of central obesity was higher in the LCF (19.2%; P = 0.008) and LCW (16.0%; P = 0.04) groups than in the LC group (6.3%). Most of the metabolic variables (weight, waist circumference, serum glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, ApoE, and blood pressure) were significantly reduced from baseline in all 3 groups. However, the severity of MetS, presented as the mean count of MetS components, was significantly reduced in the LCW group compared with the LC group among participants with confirmed MetS at baseline (P = 0.045). Our results suggest that a low-intensity lifestyle education program is effective in MetS management. Flaxseed and walnut supplementation may ameliorate central obesity. Further studies with larger sample sizes and of longer duration are needed to examine the role of these foods in the prevention and management of MetS.
PMID:View Thread
(n=4,564)1
(n=6,627)2-4
(n=6,983)5-6
(n=1,421)7
(n=1,732)Age (y)53.0±9.353.4±9.353.6±9.554.1±9.456.8±10.1<0.0001Body mass index (kg/m2)24.5±2.624.7±2.724.9±2.725.2±2.925.0±3.2<0.0001Vegetable intake (servings / week)7.9±5.08.0±4.68.2±4.68.2±4.68.6±5.1<0.0001Breakfast cereal (7 /week) [%>24.124.015.910.811.8<0.0001Parental history of premature MI (%)10.89.19.57.27.2<0.0001Hypercholesterolemia (%)13.612.211.310.810.5<0.0001Current smoking (%)8.09.812.014.916.7<0.0001Current alcohol drinking (%)71.075.075.574.573.9<0.0001Exercise 1 / week (%)71.872.672.972.769.9<0.0001History of diabetes (%)1.21.82.02.35.2<0.0001History of Hypertension (%)21.923.823.925.428.5<0.0001History of atrial fibrillation (%)1.31.51.31.81.30.67Current use of multivitamins (%)20.018.619.920.224.00.001Aspirin assignment (%)49.549.550.351.650.10.22View Thread
View Thread
JCView Thread
DoloresView Thread
Also, in his reply to Denise Minger, he does discuss wheat and says that you would have to adjust for ( I don't know if I got that right) the possibility among wheat eaters of lower green vegetable consumption, lower serum levels of monounsaturated fats, high serum levels of urea denoting high protein consumption, greater body weight. all of which are variables confounding the wheat correlation.
You can look at this. I have no idea if he is correct or not.
Also, Campbell observed the higher rate of liver cancer among children from well to do families and his research with casein was not original but an attempt to replicate a journal article from a study done in India.
DoloresView Thread
DoloresView Thread
How our ancient ancestors managed, upon coming down from the trees, to acquire large quantities of meat remains a mystery.
Most of us will eat what is at hand. (Probably the reason for our killing ourselves with fast food) Even modern hunter gatherers are not successful every time they set out to hunt, but only once every few times. I saw a film once of native hunters somewhere on a monkey hunt. I think they got about 8 monkeys for the whole tribe and I was under the impression that this hunting foray was a big deal. Not very frequent. It didn't look like there was a lot of meat on a monkey.
But the problem with us isn't the same as with our paleolithic ancestors. Nature is happy if we live to reproduce and raise children who become old enough to reproduce. Looking at the diets of most people in the West, you can see that just about any old diet with enough calories will do. However, we all want to live much longer--long enough to see our great grandchildren and retire to a water front home in Florida and sit on our rockers or play shuffle board at the senior center and complain we don't hear from our kids enough. Outside the ken of our ancient ancestors, none of whose fossil remains have been found to be older than fifty. Heck, nowadays you could reach fifty on a diet of potato chips and twinkies.
DoloresView Thread
Thank you for your comments. You may be correct. I am not 100% sure about the interpretation of the higher telomerase level, I was trying to put forward a logical argument why the opposite to the author's conclusion may also be true.
H.
P.S.
Please feel free to post more critical comments in our other threads. We will appreciate!View Thread
HereticView Thread
We replace bacon with pork belly, smoked or raw, cooked, we buy it locally from a butcher or from Asian mall in Toronto. Tastes much better!
BTW, it looks like your forum has got a robo censor, I had to insert a space character the title word, otherwise it wouldn't let me post it.View Thread
To really know as opposed to appearing to "know", he would have to try out several approaches and document each one. Until Fuhrman tries out at least a high fat low protein low carb diet on himself, beyond his own vegan diet, then I will continue treat Fuhrman's views less seriously then he perhaps deserves. His choice.View Thread
_ a ) reduce carbohydrate consumption
_ or _
_ b ) increase insulin sensitivity of the body tissues (with drugs or by healing the insulin insensitivity).
View Thread
Do more than just suggest....tell them this is the way its going to be.Period.View Thread

Thank you for supporting your little brother.

Re: that comment from the medical student was like and expression of affection
You are probably right! It is said that a hatred is only an expression of unrecognized love...
Best regards,
StanView Thread
When saying that a diet high in vegetables and low in calories and low in fats may greatly reduce a risk of diabetes type 2, it may be partially true but not quite. It will not eliminate it! For example, in rural India diabetes rate was still about 3% (13% in the cities). From fat and meat? I don't think so!
I find it ironic that Novick is quoting study supporting anti-diabetes (protective) effect of meat consumption, to defend his potatoes! Quote:
From the study.
"Fish, chicken, and potatoes, when cooked in ways other than frying, loaded on factors that were not associated with increased risk of diabetes."
Note: In the context of US and Canada, "frying" means using mostly a fake baking "lard" made of of hydrogenated veg oils!
H.View Thread
I am simply raising the possibility that vit D supplementation may be a problem.The overall bulk of the data supports vitamin D supplementation at this point in time.View Thread
Here is what dr. Fuhrman says in his book on pages 190 and 191, "Eat to Live": He says all diabetics have accelerated artery damage and have a high mortality rate from heart disease. Therefore he says that any diet for t1 or t2 should at least attempt to reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke or other cardiovascular events. "When diabetics take a more aggressive and progressive nutritional approach they can prevent many of the complications that befall diabetics". Neither Barnard, McDougall nor Fuhrman would recommend ever using any processed seed oils or butter, mayo or other fats or meats or dairy. Fuhrman would recommend beans as the starch and nuts and seeds while McDougall and Barnard would recommend in addition to beans, squashes, rice, sweetpotatoes, corn. Of course you would have to judge the amounts. Fuhrman's book recommends fish twice a week for diabetics but you would have to ask him if that applies to both 1 and 2 diabetes.
He continues--"I find my type 1 diabetic patients requiring about half as much insulin as they did prior to adopting my lifesaving program
He says--THEIR SUGARS DON'T SWING WILDLY UP AND DOWN, and since they are using less insulin, they have less chance of developing potentially dangerous hypoglycemic episodes.
You can google Fuhrman but to ask him questions and be a member of his internet group you have to pay.
Dr. Mcdougall often answers questions if you e mail him directly and you can go on the discussion group, (there are several different topics) and ask if there are any other t1s using his diet. If you go on his site there is also a video somewhere on diabetes but I do not know if it applies to t1. You can also ask members of the group if his book, McDougall's Medicine has a chapter on t1 diabetes.
Dr. Bernard says in his book that the same type of diet for type 2 diabetes is likely to be enormously beneficial for people with t1 as well. This is hardly research and I do not think from this statement that he has studied t1. He does mention the DCCT study which showed that tight control with insulin prevented more complications.
I am sorry I could not be more help and hope you keep in touch with your journey to better health.
DoloresView Thread
Re: thyroid problems among certain Poles. There are areas of the world that are notoriously low on iodine--the closer to the ocean the more iodine--and if people are only eating locally it is likely they might get goiter.
DoloresView Thread
That's the best comment I have read about that sugar study so far!
View Thread
We need to take a look at this before we supplement with any level of vit D(other than natural food and sunlight).
You can't just quickly scan this article.You have to read carefully.
It opens up the possibility that long term, any level of vit D supplementation (over decades) may be harmful.View Thread
Thats why I said his actions cast doubt on his credibility.View Thread
DoloresView Thread
H.View Thread
You were speculating, right? I remember years ago reading that Covert Bailey said that a fat person should walk and walk and walk because exercise increased mitochondria. So I am wondering if exercise added to diet (of course your diet proposals are speculative) would perk up all those mitochondria you speak of.
Did I understand you correctly? It looks like you said the best diet for a diabetic would be higher carb? If that is true you should write your theory on the web md diabetes support group where just about everyone is a religious low carber. ( And I believe all but 2 of the correspondents use meds and/or insulin. One person wrote in that she has been doing great on low carb for 15 years, her blood sugar levels are fine. She has been on insulin for the last nine years.)
I do not know if I can judge my own energy level. At my gym I can bike (so far) 7 to 8 miles on a stationary bike. I know I could go farther but I get bored and the seats are hard plastic and limit the amount of time I can sit pain free. On the recumbent bike I can go 12 to 15 miles and while the seats are softer I still get bored. I get everything done I need to do and babysit seven very active grandchildren. (A true test of stamina and energy is the length of time you can play Rapunzel and Princesses, go fish, War and chase around after a mobile one year old who, while God can't be everywhere at once, she seems to be.)
I do try to keep my calories to around 1200 per day but am sure many days I go over. I would have to say that if I were low carbing I would do the same thing.
I am pretty sure that it has been shown that Atkins dieters lose weight, not because of some anti laws of thermodynamics anomaly but because his diet is very satiating and they are not so hungry.
I know that the low carbers on the diabetes group eat very low carb and I know they eat eggs and meat and cheese but I do not know if you would consider this a high fat diet according to your own standards of high fat. To me it is very high fat.
How do you measure mitochondrial depletion?
DoloresView Thread
Maybe its sugar and not saturated fat or carbs that are the problem.
http://www.webmd.com/diet/features/healthy_oils_healthy_fats?src=RSS_PUBLICView Thread
See Related Eating & Diet Communities
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Spotlight: Member Stories
Related News
Report Problems to the
Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Other Member Communities
- Dieting Club: 10 - 25 Lbs Member Community Share Your Tips and Support!
- Caregiving Member Community The Support and Understanding You Need!
- Parenting Friends Talking Member Community Get Support from Members Like You!
-
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2012 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.

