Diet Debate
We debate the various types of diets.
See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests

Sugar is certainly part of the problem.
But to reduce it to "Carbohydrates, anyone?", to imply that complex carbs as in whole grains are part of the problem, or just carbs in any form, is not correct.
The Pritikin diet gets most of its calories from complex carbohydrates, yet cures all of the degenerative diseases that the SAD creates.
"The Problem" has more to do with excess calories from all sources (carbs, fat and protein), and inadequate nutrients (phytochemicals, antioxidants, vitamins, minerals), rather than a precise combination of carbs, fat and protein. That's what the science has been showing us, for the last 20 years.
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

Here's a 4 min video.
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/protein-puberty-and-pollutants/
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

Yes, but even with the Lyon Heart Study, in 4 years, 25% of the Mediterranean Diet group had a heart attack or died. These results are "wretched" compared to Esselstyn's results.
Esselstyn has the best results ever published, for treatment of heart disease.
The Ornish diet (I believe without statins) reduced heart attacks by 50%, compared to standard medical care. That's great, but poor compared to Esselstyn. What is the difference between Ornish and Esselstyn? Mostly Esselstyn is stricter. Nothing with a face or a mother. No dairy products. And Esselstyn gave his patients a cholesterol check every 2 weeks. They could not cheat.
If H is right, then Esselstyn should do poorly, with all those veggies and carbs and all. Hmmmm.
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

Re: "...are all caused by a plant based nutrition that is too high in carbohydrates and too low in animal fats and meat!'
Yes, but in your opinion so is the national debt, global warming, apartheid, and Al Quaeda.
If cataracts were caused by that, why did mine reverse, by wearing dark wrap around sun glasses?
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

So sorry to hear of your fall. Sounds like you are getting around already after only 2 weeks, though, which definitely shows that you are strong. Give 'em hell.
What is your blood level of D? You really cannot know the right level of D supplement without a blood test.
My I offer my observations about sun, to get vitamin D?
When I was 58, I attended the Pritikin Center, and learned that sunlight was very healthy, to make vitamin D. I realized that I got zero sunlight on the typical day. So, for 2 years, from age 58 to 60, I got 1 hour of sun daily at noon, running outdoors 4 miles a day, 7 days a week. If it was above 60 degrees, I ran without a T-shirt, just shorts, to maximize the sun exposure. When I was 60, I attended the Pritikin Center again. The doctor assigned to me said, "You're skinny, why don't you get a bone density check." I thought that was a waste of $200, since I had just got so much sunlight and running. But, I did it anyway.
To my shock and dismay, my hips were at the Bottom of osteopenia, almost to the osteoporosis range, for bone density. My lower back was at the top of osteopenia, almost to normal. Great.
Going home to Utah, my doctor got me a testosterone and vitamin D blood test. The testosterone was normal, but the vitamin D (tested in June, after lots and lots of sunlight) was 16. Normal is 30 - 55. 16 is quite deficient, and well correlated with heart disease, heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, various cancers, etc. Really super.
So did I get enough sunlight? Yes, absolutely. I got enough sunlight to get skin tags, which my dermatologist told me might be pre-cancerous (just in general, not my skin tags specifically). He happily squirted them with liquid nitrogen in about 30 seconds, and charged my insurance $200.
My opthamologist said I had cataracts, and most doctors would recommend that I have them out, but he would recommend to just watch them. That was the last day I ever went outdoors, without dark wrap-around sunglasses. The next year, the dr didn't mention the cataracts. Without the sunlight, the cataracts went away, very luckily.
So, I got lots of UV to damage my skin and give me apparently mild cataracts. But I did not get enough sunlight to give me anything but very deficient vitamin D. And the whole time I was taking a 400IU vitamin D supplement, starting from years earlier.
Take home message #1: Each person is different. A few people have normal vitamin D without any supplement or thought of sunlight exposure. Most people need about 2000 IU of vitamin D. I do. A few people need much more vitamin D to get normal blood level.
Another take home message #2: The 400 IU of vitamin D I took, was pretty worthless. Most people need 2000 IU. Refer to message #1.
I recommend Dr. Fuhrman's Osteoporosis DVD. It includes a very informative discussion and booklet and a 15 minute exercise video. Obviously it will take a while before you are doing the exercises, and you will modify the necessary exercises to your capability at the time.
Dolores, you are a champ.
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

HEY - I agree, once again. This is scary !! Good to chat.
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

These links have extensive discussion debunking the paleo diet myths, and low carb diet myths.
Both links go the the same series of videos. The first link provides a short synopsis of what is on each video.
http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2013nl/jan/ppositive.htm
http://www.plantpositive.com/1-the-journalist-gary-taubes-1/
There is pleny there.
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

Interesting link, as always.
Full disclosure. I did not read the entire article.
The first study, the polyunsaturated fat diet reduced heart attacks by 50 to 65%, compared to an equally high fat diet of saturated fat (The Finnish Mental Health Study). This is pretty amazing. The polyunsaturated fat diet included soft margarine, which is TRANS fat. And the heathy diets advocated on the Ornish - Fuhrman board, exclude the polyunsaturated fats also. So, this is a contest between awful diets. It would be interesting to compare the death rate from heart disease, to today's death rate. I'll bet they were both very high. Even so, a 50 and 65% heart disease reduction, in terms of actual results, acutal heart disease in people, instead of cholesterol measurements and theories, does not bode well for those who advocate saturated fat always.
The take home message is to pay attention to the programs that have the best results, which is absolutely neither of the diets in the Finnish Mental Hospital Study.
But I will save the link. Thanks, jc, as always.
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

A 3 minute video. Some people like theories better than results.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I02aVkdi_M&feature=youtu.be
Best regards, EngineerGuyView Thread

See Related Eating & Diet Communities
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Other Member Communities
- Dieting Club: 10 - 25 Lbs Member Community Share Your Tips and Support!
- Caregiving Member Community The Support and Understanding You Need!
- Parenting Friends Talking Member Community Get Support from Members Like You!
-
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.



