I tend to round creatinine numbers off to X.x and forget the second decimal place. The accuracy of the test has limits, and the difference between 1.70 and 1.75 isn't significant.
The question about the drug is hard to answer without knowing exactly what is in the medication. But a lot of NSAID pain relievers can eventually cause some damage, especially at higher doses.
If the ultrasound was not a doppler, specifically looking at renal blood flow, then doing one might be a good idea. (It probably was not doppler if they were looking at causes for the back pain.) You'll have to ask.
I can't really guess at a change from 2.7 to 1.7, unless some degree of dehydration was involved in the higher number. That's a really big drop, so I'd wonder about possible errors in the 2.7 test.View Thread
There aren't physical symptoms until things get really serious (fatigue, nausea, changes in skin color, mental confusion). But 1.4 mg/dL is just barely above the normal range.
Ask your doc. The advice will probably be to keep watching it over a couple of years just to be sure it isn't increasing rapidly. Slight increases with every decade above 30 or 40 years is not unusual. Blood testing is the best way to spot early signs of renal damage.
That said, numbness in the legs and slight creatinine increases could both be due to poor circulation, but they aren't really related to each other, except for having a similar cause.View Thread
At a glance, these numbers really aren't all that scary. 125 bG isn't bad for a type II diabetic. Yes it could be a tad lower, but considering that a lot of folks walk around with bG of 175-200 or more, 125 is darned good.
eGFR of 57 is frankly negligible. Remember that the "e" stands for "estimated" and these estimates are often off by a considerable margin. 57 to 60 is withjin the error limitis of the test.
Total protein, too, is within the limits of the test accuracy. If your urine protin losses are high, then it might be a factor to consider, but judged by itself, not a big deal.View Thread
You should be the SYSOP for this thing. Frankly there was nothing wrong with the older system that we all had used for years and had become accustomed to its quirks and glitches. In fact the older system was far superior in that it allowed the user to preview the text before posting it!
There was no need to replace it with this mess (othjer than to keep a few geeks employed doing something).
(Sorry gang. I make my living in geekdom, too. But I never change something that is working more-or-less correctly just for a few added bells and whistles that go largely unused, and a potential boatload of instability.)View Thread
The "poll" feature is a ludicrous thing to have onj this sort of forum. Unfortunately it is a built-in feature of a lot of forum software.
(For decades I rand a transplant forum, and toe software that we bought to run it on had a "poll" feature included by default. I went into the software and disabled this feature since it just didn't apply to what we were using it for.)
Renal disease is highly individual and must be managed on a case by case basis. So who gives a flip what 12% or 46% of 200 people think.
That poll thing should never have been included in the software for this groups discussion.View Thread
What you mention states that you "discussed" kypokalemia and hyponatremia, low potassium and low sodium, respectively. But it doesn't say how low the levels are. You need to be cautious about the potassium especially. Both are important but the potassium can be far more dangerous.
Metabolic acidosis and the low serum CO2 are very probably related. The CO2 has to strike a balance with the Chloride, or Cl, to maintain a proper blood pH. However, ALKALOSIS and low CO2 is rather hard to figure. Seeing the Chloride and other lab numbers all together will help.
Anemia, in the absence of bleeding, generally is caused by to renal failure, but this can be treated rather easily with Procrit or Epogen or sometimes Aranesp.
Sorry I haven't any good guesses but the lab numbers might help a lot.View Thread
It can take from 6 weeks to a few months for the fistula to 'mature'. The vein does tend to enlarge somewhat; that is what the maturation process is all about. The machines work most effectively when they get a lot of good, unobstructed blood supply, so a larger diameter vein gives better flow. That's the whole idea. Obviously younger, stretchier, springier veins may enlarge more than older, less resilient ones. But if the vein wouldn't enlarge at all then that would defeat the purpose of doing it.
There are generally a few minor restrictions to activity right after the fistula surgery is done, mostly to let the incision heal completely. You don't want an artery to tear and suddenly start bleeding. (Remember, we are attaching an artery directly to a vein without passing through the tiny capillaries. So the pressures and the bloodflow right at the fistula are greater than you'd have in the tiny capillaries of the skin.)
Anyway, that area will need to be protected while it heals, and continue to be somewhat protected as the artery/vein combo matures and enlarged.View Thread
I really think that the stress of losing the baby is affecting your perceptions a little bit; that is totally understandable. And the stress, perhaps depression, can be affecting your physical health as well.
Pregnancy is a huge stress on the body and on all its systems. Changes to renal function are not at all unusual during and after a pregnancy.
Nephrologsts are not risk takers: they have seen too many cases to assume that there is ever a predictable pattern that fits every patient. So they tend to be very, very cautious doctors.
I'm male not female, but I'd say to have a bit of faith in the nephrologist, and give your body another 6 to 12 months to reset itself, realign, and recover.
There might indeed be a slight bit of residual damage to the protein capturing function of the kidneys, but it is too soon to know that. And even if some change did occur, if it is minimal and stays that way, then it should pose no long term problem.
An extra note: never have blood tests done within a day or two of a strenuous workout like a triathlon or even a 500k. The lab values will be so out of whack that the results are invalid. And I would hope that you are not hooked on extremely high-protein diets or supplements like whey protein or creatine monohydrate. These substances will at least screw up lab test numbers and possible can cause long term and irreversible renal damage.View Thread