See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests

I was diagnosed with PC last year. Type 2, Stage 1. My urologist said at my age(63) and being in good health, I had many options (radical prostatecomy, brachetherapy, radiation, etc). I was very concerned about the various side effects mainly impotence and/or incontenance.
My wife's cousin had the radical surgery a few years ago and he had no problems. He chose the surgery because he
wanted it out right away. He ended up going to Johns Hopkins
about an 1-1/2 hr from his home. He said it was one of the
leading PC surgery centers in the East.
My daughter's father-in-law had brachetherapy a couple of years ago and he is fine. He said he wanted something that
was less evasive and still had a high success rate and
minimal side effects.
I never considered radiation because I did not want multiple
trips to the clinic for treatment.
It turns out that there was an excellent radiation oncologist in my area (supposedly one of the best on the East Coast).
I scheduled a consult with him and really liked him. He
specialized in brachetherapy so I decided to go that way.
Because I had a large prostate, I had to get Lupron shots to
shrink it. It took two injections to get it small enough to allow
for swelling afted the procedure. It ended up being about 1 year from diagnosis to treatment.
The procedure was simple and painless. It has only been a
month since the seed implants. So far no problems and I am relieved at that. I still am having some residual effects from
the Lupron (mainly hot fashes, low libido). My urologist said
it may take another month or so for the Lupron to wear off.
So, ask around like you are doing. Do you own research
and find the best doctor you can to do the procedure.
Cancer is a scary thing to talk about. But the advancements
in PC treatment in recent years has been incredible. Thankfully you got an early diagnosis so you should do fine.
Good luck with whatever treatment you decide.View Thread

I hope this reply is not too late.
I had a good urologist. Based on the PSA and the DRE, he suggested a biopsy. After it was confirmed that I had PC, but
it was very treatable and slow growing. He mentioned the most common treatments, including "watching and waiting". He said there was no need to rush into any course of action.
and I could take my time to think about the options. He gave me the normal pamphlet on PC and lent me a book to use as
a reference guide. The book was very good. It explained the types and stages as well as many treatment options. At first I was overwhelmed with all the options, risks, side effects, etc.
I was confused about what to do. Fortunately I had a relative that had gone through PC a few years ago. I knew he was doing OK so I asked his advice. He said his decision was easy. He was told he had type 2, stage 1 PC (same as me) but he wanted it out right away! So he went for the surgery
to remove the prostate gland. He said he looked around to
find a surgeon who had done "hundreds" of prostate removals. He ended up going to Johns Hopkins (about 1 hr from home).
He was very happy with the result and would recommend
that surgeon.
I said I was considering brachetherapy(BT) and he said that
he knew a few guys that had BT and they used a local
radiation oncologist. Turns out that doctor is one of the
best on the East Coast and only 15 min from my home.
In the meantime, I was telling my daughter that I had PC and
she said her father-in-law had PC and had BT. So I called him. He said was very happy the way things turned out. He had
no lingering side effects, which was my major concern.
So I set up an appointment to see to local radiation oncologist.
I really liked him from the initial consult. He said he often worked with my urologist so that made the decision easier.
Once I made my decision, I started telling my close friends
and extended family about my PC. I was amazed at how
many knew someone who had PC and elected BT and were
all doing fine.
The only glitch I had was that my prostate was too large for
the BT. Both my urologist and oncologist said that was not
a big problem. I could get a Lupron shot to shrink it.
So I got a volume study to get a baseline size and
confirmation that needed the Lupron shot. After 3 mo I had
another volume study. My PG was still too large so I needed
a second shot. After another 3 mo my PG finally shrunk down
enough for the BT.
It was nearly 1 year from my diagnosis until the BT.
Part of the delay (Nov 2011 until Mar 2012) was my call.
I did not want to get my first Lupron shot until I got back from my winter vacation. The rest was 3 mo between the first and second shot, 3 mo until the second volume study, 3 more months for the Lupron to work, a month to get the 3rd volume
study and another month to get the BT.
My urologist had assured me along the way that there was
no problem with the delay based on (1) my PC type & stage
and (2) Lupron is used in chemotherapy for PC. So in a sense I was be treated as I waited.
My recommendation is to get your self a good urologist that you like and trust. Then ask around to see what others
had to say.
I did not mind waiting for the BT. I never seriously
considered radiation because I did not want to go through
multiple visits for treatment.
My urologist had told me about the side effects of the Lupron.
So if you need those as prep for the BT it is something else to consider.
I can say the my urologist was not kidding about the "hot flashes" and "temporary impotence". He said not to worry about the impotence because the Lupron would also reduce the desire for sex anyway.
Fortunately I have a very understanding and patient wife.
Sorry for the lengthy reply. Hopefully is was worth reading.
I wish you the best with whatever course of treatment you
choose.
jd_day1_rev1View Thread
See Related Cancer Communities
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Other Prostate Cancer Information
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.

